Skip to main content

ANTH 663

Analytical Methods in Archaeology and Conservation

Christopher Dostal
Assistant Professor

Office hours: Friday 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm, or by appointment.
Location: ANTH 102B
Email: dostalc@tamu.edu
Phone: 979-845-6355

Course Description

This course is designed to introduce students to a variety of analytical methods used in archaeology and archaeological conservation. The class is separated into two sections: artifact material analysis, and artifact documentation. Material analysis is the way that we study artifacts, both in structure and elemental composition. Classifying an artifact by use is often only just the beginning of an archaeological study; knowing that a projectile point is a projectile point can only tell us so much, but knowing what that point is made of can often tell us where it is from and can suggest trade routes and habitation patterns. Artifact documentation is one of the most important aspects to any archaeological project, but doubly so in archaeological conservation. Proper documentation can allow for studies to be completed without demanding that the artifacts be present, and often details not readily observable become apparent during the documentation process. This class will cover the traditional methods of artifact documentation, photography and sketches, as well as 3D computer modeling and digitization of artifacts and 3D printing. Though this course will emphasize existing equipment and techniques used in the anthropology department, capabilities available elsewhere on campus, like neutron activation analysis and scanning electron microscopes, will be included.

Course Prerequisites

Graduate Classification or Instructor Approval

Textbook and/or Resource Materials
Scientific Methods and Cultural Heritage: An Introduction to the Application of Materials Science to Archaeometry and Conservation Science by Gilberto Artioli (2009)

*Other readings will be provided by the instructor

Assignments

Analysis Project and Report – (35% of Grade)
Due Week 16

Each student will choose one of the provided artifacts and analyze it with a variety of the methods learned in class. (In exceptional, pre-approved circumstances you can provide your own artifact, but it is almost always a bad decision to do so.) Each student will individually analyze their artifact with the XRF, FTIR, and optical microscopy, the artifact will need to be photographed and drawn, and then it will be laser scanned, and it will be modelled using photogrammetry. The laser scanned model will be 3D printed and compared to the original. Along with the images and files, a project report will be handed in, describing the historical background of the object, the techniques used, and the benefits of using one or the other for this particular object. All sources must be cited in text with page numbers, and the format of the citation should be stated on the bottom of the first page. (e.g. ‘This paper follows the APA citation format’). Papers MUST use Times New Roman, 12pt, double spaced, with 1” margins. Papers need to be submitted as a .doc or .docx file.

 

Critical Response (10% of Grade)
Due Week 10
Each student will write a 5-page critical response to one of the pre-selected academic papers provided. The review should include a brief summary of the article, your thoughts on the strengths and weaknesses of the study, how the study could be improved, and suggestions for future work. All sources must be cited in text with page numbers, and the format of the citation should be stated on the bottom of the first page. (e.g. ‘This paper follows the APA citation format’). Papers MUST use Times New Roman, 12pt, double spaced, with 1” margins. Papers need to be submitted as a .doc or .docx file.

 

Scientific Literacy Paper (10% of Grade)
Due Week 13
Each student will write a paper that ‘translates’ a scientific journal article about archaeology or conservation into a popular magazine-style article, like what one might find in National Geographic or Popular Science. Despite their best intentions, the authors typically doing the translating are rarely experts in the field they are describing, and so it is imperative that we as scholars are familiar with the types of shortcuts and metaphors that might be used to correctly or incorrectly convey complex scientific ideas and results to a lay-person audience. The length of this paper will be dependent on the length of the article assigned, but 10 pages is an estimated baseline. Forget about citations for this one paper! Papers MUST use Times New Roman, 12pt, double spaced, with 1” margins. Papers need to be submitted as a .doc or .docx file.

Exams

Each exam is worth 20% of your final grade. Each exam will consist of 25 multiple choice questions worth 2 points each, and 10 short answer questions worth 5 points each. I will provide the exams, you do not need to buy a blue book. Exams are non-cumulative.
Exam 1: Week 8
Exam 2: Week 16

Grading Policies

Exams (2) – 40%
Analysis Project and Report -35%
Critical Response – 10%
Scientific Literacy Paper – 10%
Reading summary and discussions – 5%

A=90-100; B=80-89; C=70-79; D=60-69; F=59 and below

Course Schedule

This schedule is tentative and subject to change.

Week 1

Introduction, Description, and Syllabus
Material Analysis – What do we look for?

Read: Artioli p. 1-15
Activities: Distribution of artifacts for project and the articles to be reviewed.

Week 2

Artifact photography & Optical Microscopy, scope photography, Image processing

Read: Abramowitz, M. (2003) Microscope: Basics and Beyond.
Read: Dorrell, P. (1994) Photography in Archaeology and Conservation Pages 8-19, 208-237

Week 3

Artifact Sketching Guest Lecture from Dr. Carolyn Kennedy

Read:  Collett (2012) Introduction to Drawing Archaeological Pottery

Week 4

3D Modeling: Using documentation to recreate an artifact.

Read: Tanner et al. (2020) The Digital Reconstruction of the Sutton Hoo Ship
Watch: 6 intro videos at rhino3d.com/learn/
    Interface Basics
    Navigation and Display
    Object Types
    Selecting Objects
    Modeling Strategies
    Modeling a Watercan

Week 5

3D Modeling 2: Arranging Mesh models in Rhino & 3D Printing.

Read: Castro and Dostal (2020) Computer Graphics for Archaeology
Read: Koller et al (2009) Research Challenges for Digital Archives of 3D Cultural Heritage Models

Week 6

3D Digitization using Photogrammetry    

Read: McCarthy (2014): Multi-Image Photogrammetry as a Practical Tool for Cultural heritage Survey and Community Engagement
Read: Torres (2019) Mapping at Depth: A Case Study of Digital Video Frame Photogrammetry Applied to Underwater Archaeology
Read: Porter et al. (2016) A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field.
Read: Rossi et al. (2019) Systematic Photogrammetric Recording
of the Gnalić Shipwreck Hull Remains and Artefacts. In 3D Recording and Interpretation for Maritime Archaeology. Ed. McCarthy et al. Springer. Cham, Switzerland.

Week 7

3D Digitization using Laser Scanning

Read: Dostal et al (2020) Integrating Digital and Conventional Recording Techniques for the Documentation and Reconstruction of an 18th-Century Wooden Ship from Alexandria, VA.
Read:  Di Paola et al (2022) 3D Digital Tools for the Archaeological Massive Artifacts Documentation
Read: Dostal and Yamafune (2018) Photogrammatic Texture Mapping: A Method for Increasing the Fidelity of 3D Models of Cultural Heritage Materials.

Week 8

Exam 1

Week 9

Spring Break

Week 10

X-Ray Fluorescence

Read: Artioli p. 29-37
Read: Moens et al. (2000). X-Ray Fluorescence in Modern Analytical Methods in Art and Archaeology
Read: Bruker’s X-Ray Radiation Safety: Manual for Operator Training
*Critical Response Paper Due

Week 11

Guest Speaker: Kim Breyfogle
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

Readings TBD

Week 12

X-Ray Diffraction, Mass Spectroscopy, NAA

Read: Artioli p. 50-52, 178-180, 214- 216
Read: Abreau, C. et al (2015). A Brief Overview in the Study of Archaeological Materials Through the Technique of XRD.
Read: Glasscock and Neff (2004) Neutron Activation Analysis and provenance research in archaeology
Read: Ciarlo et al. (2022) Lead Isotope Analysis by TIMS for Provenance Studies in Archaeology: Roman Anchor Stocks from the Catalonian Coast, Spain

Week 13

Tentative: tour of NSC

*Scientific Literacy Paper due

Week 14

Reading Day – No Classes

Week 15

Semester review, exam review, project wrap up.

Final exam.